Skip to content
Param Veda

Display & Audio

Theme

Font Size

Show/Hide

Audio

Uses your browser’s text-to-speech voices installed on your device. Auto prefers a Sanskrit voice if available.

Karma Veda · The Practice of Accountable Action

यन्त्र-उत्तरदायित्वम्

yantra-uttaradāyitvam

Official text Sūkta 17 of 18

Mūla · Original verse

Sanskrit

यन्त्रं कर्म करोत्यद्य, दायित्वं मानवस्य तु । गुप्तदोषं परीक्षेत, न्यायं तत्र नियोजयेत् ॥
yantraṃ karma karoty adya, dāyitvaṃ mānavasya tu | gupta-doṣaṃ parīkṣeta, nyāyaṃ tatra niyojayet ||
01

Anvaya

Plain English meaning

A machine may act today, but responsibility remains human. Examine hidden defects and place justice within the system.

02

Kāvya

Poetic rendering

No mechanism is beyond morality merely because its hand is made of code, steel, market, or procedure.

03

Manana

Contemplation

Responsibility belongs across the chain of design, data, deployment, purchase, governance, and use. Automation must not create a gap through which accountability disappears.

Prayoga

Civilizational practice

Maintain named owners, risk classification, independent testing, incident reporting, human review, contestability, secure shutdown, and remedy for people harmed.

Param Veda Upaniṣad · One-to-One Bhāṣya

Sit near the question

The companion moves from words and meaning to inward reflection, public application, boundaries against misuse, dialogue, and practice.

Padārtha · Key terms

yantra — machine or system; karma — action; dāyitva — responsibility; mānava — human being; gupta-doṣa — hidden defect; nyāya — justice

Anvaya · Sequence of meaning

A machine may act today, but responsibility remains human. Examine hidden defects and place justice within the system.

Bhāṣya · Commentary

Automation can distribute action without distributing conscience. The hymn closes that gap: responsibility remains in the human chain of design, data, testing, procurement, deployment, governance, use, and response. Complexity may divide duties; it cannot make harm ownerless.

Loka-saṃgraha · Civilizational application

High-impact systems require named accountable owners, documented purpose, data provenance, security, representative performance testing, monitoring, human review, explanation, contestability, incident response, secure shutdown, and remedy. People should know when a consequential system affects them.

Maryādā · Boundary against misuse

A human in the loop is not sufficient if that person lacks time, authority, understanding, or a genuine ability to disagree. Conversely, insisting on manual action can preserve human bias and error. The standard is accountable control proportionate to impact.

Praśna–Uttara

Teacher and student

Questions keep doctrine open to inquiry
Student “Who is responsible when many organisations built the system?”
Teacher “Each bears duties within its control, and governance must ensure the chain has no unowned gap.”
Student “Can a system be used if it cannot fully explain itself?”
Teacher “Only where impact, monitoring, appeal, and alternative evidence make residual opacity proportionate and governable.”

Prayoga · Practice

  1. 1 Map responsibility from design to remedy for one automated decision.
  2. 2 Give the affected person notice, meaningful human review, and power to contest.